0

James Cridland’s International Radio Trends — Why the words we use matter

James Cridland, radio futurologist, is a conference speaker, writer and consultant. He runs the media information website media.info and helps organise the yearly Next Radio conference. He also publishes podnews.net, a daily briefing on podcasting and on-demand, and writes a weekly international radio trends newsletter, at james.crid.land.

 

Above: out for a walk round the neighbourhood recently, I happened upon this proud-looking sign. 4ZZZ, an alternative music station, is a curious listen at any time of day, and is currently in its radiothon fund-raiser. And here’s a podcast about their history ▸.

Terry Wogan, a popular UK radio broadcaster, used to say that he only ever spoke to one person when he was on the air. Any radio programmer will tell you that the language that you use on-air is incredibly important. Steve Martin, the best programme director I’ve ever worked for (at The Pulse in Bradford), was especially picky about the phrases you used and the way you said things. What sticks in my head is an observation one day that “The Pulse’s Elliot Webb” was fine, but “Elliot Webb from The Pulse” was much less clearer.

So it’s really exciting to see research released by Spotify about language and pace. They took more than 5,300 podcast episodes, transcribed them all, and compared playback data for them all: a significant amount of data to do a proper amount of academic research on language in audio.

The full paper, available here as a PDF, is a really interesting read. They discover that exclusive words like “he, they, her” perform worse than inclusive ones like “we, you, my”. Positivity works better than negativity. Swearing, but also “um, er, oh, right, cool” type filler words, appear to harm a podcast rather than help it. And high-engagement podcast creators seem to speak relatively fast, too.

It’s stuff that doesn’t come as a surprise to many people in radio: but I’ve never seen as much data behind these assertions as exist here. A fascinating, if difficult, read that links to other research.

The clever folks at RadioAnalyzer have seen similar with radio streams, they tell me.

I’ve always been cautious about the claim that I see many giving about broadcast radio and TV being “so much more resilient than the internet in a time of emergency”. That’s fine: but it isn’t always true: if you’ve one big point of failure, occasionally, it fails.

A fire in Bilsdale on the North Yorkshire moors wiped out TV, FM and DAB broadcasts for more than a million people. This is one time where the UK’s policy of co-locating transmitter sites is an Achilles heel.

For television, Bilsdale fed a number of repeater sites, including Whitby, where they’ve switched to an emergency pre-multiplexed satellite feed which contains London programming.

Meanwhile, the this BBC News report is to be admired. It claims that “BBC TV channels” are back on for many (I understand there’s a temporary, low-power transmitter on-site), and that “BBC Tees FM is also back on air”. Not a single mention of any other broadcaster. Independent and impartial, as long as it’s not a story that contains its competitors! It reminds me of the glorious days when the BBC ran its own ‘trusted’ and ‘impartial’ internet search engine, where a search for “Classic FM” returned entries for BBC Radio 3, its competitor – a bug, of course, not on purpose, oh no.

In any case, I recommend an hourly reminder of all (or at least some) of the plaforms any radio station is available on. “On your mobile, on 96.9FM, on DAB Digital Radio and on Sky, this is MultiPlatform Radio”. At the very least, if one of them falls over, your listeners know they can still listen.


One of the cleverest things that UK commercial radio company Global did was to buy into the outdoor advertising market. It can use unsold inventory to promote other parts of its business: this, for example, showing their ongoing coverage for the Capital Weekender Live. (It’s also, of course, capable of building this into the sponsorship package.)

Primesight, one of the outdoor advertising companies bought by Global, was once owned by the parent company of the original Virgin Radio – alongside cinema ad company Pearl & Dean. In those days, it was expensive to produce and paste the posters, even if you could get the placements – now, with electronic billboards in many places, it’s rather simpler to make the best out of cross-promotion activities. Technology has made cross-media ownership much more efficient.

Outdoor advertising has historically been quite bouyant, though I imagine the last 18 months has bucked that trend. Ordinarily, outdoor appears to follow different trends than broadcast radio advertising: and interesting that “radio + outdoor” is a thing in many different countries. In Australia, APN News & Media owned both ARN (radio), APN Outdoor and AdShel. The US, of course, saw ClearChannel own both radio and outdoor; in Canada, Pattison owns many radio stations as well as outdoor. I’m sure there are plenty more examples.


Want to supercharge your radio show? Here’s a £1 week-long trial of Show Prep – from a world class radio consultant and the best show-prep writer in the UK. Great for UK stations, or for English-language stations everywhere, too. (ad)


  • Perfect for backtiming to the news: this Twitter account posts a song with every length, counting up one second every day.
  • “Radio output for young people – live or on-demand – seems to be losing the battle for attention” – Matt Deegan looks at new UK data. His suggestion is – as mine has been for many years – ensure that you’re not just focusing on live radio, but focus on audio in all its forms. For younger-audiences, I maintain you should make content for on-demand first, and then air that content on the radio: and would suggest we’re currently doing it the wrong way round. If you’re still chopping up bits of a breakfast show to reheat for a podcast later, I’m not sure that’s the right plan.
  • Related to the above, here’s how TV viewing is going across the world. New Zealand’s figures are fascinatingly low. Nielsen is a cheerleader for its broadcast clients, so when it is saying things like “reach levels are dropping between 2% and 3% each year as viewing behaviors fragment” it’s worth looking at.
  • Always good to see some proper media regulation going on – in this case, siding with the radio presenter. Congratulations to LBC’s James O’Brien. Fun to compare this kind of regulation with the lacklustre stuff going on in Australia, where the most powerful media regulator currently is YouTube, rather than ACMA.
  • Nothing much to do with radio, but I have been making my own hybrid TV box and quite enjoying it. Now I’ve got a decent EPG and more channels in HD, too.

It’s absolutely not (that) necessary, but if anyone wants to support my work in any way, you can BuyMeACoffee – become a member to give regularly or just give a one-off coffee if you’d like to support me in some way.

.

James Cridland

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *